CE, July 8, 1988, Prime Minister v/ SABDEC: the administration can without any time limit: Withdraw a decision granting a subsidy when the conditions for its granting have not been respected
CE Sec., October 12, 2009, Fontenille: the administration can without any time limit, repeal a decision creating rights whose maintenance is subject to a condition that is no longer satisfied
CE ass., October 26, 2001, Ternon: The administration can only repeal or withdraw a decision creating rights if it is illegal and if the repeal or withdrawal occurs within a period of 4 months following its enactment
CE sect., March 6, 2009, Coulibaly: The administration can only repeal or withdraw a decision creating rights if it is illegal and if the repeal or withdrawal occurs within a period of 4 months following its enactment
CE sect., November 6, 2002, Soulier: pecuniary advantage is a criterion for identifying a decision creating rights.
CE sect., November 29, 2002, Assistance publique Hôpitaux de Marseille: An advantage obtained by fraud is unworthy of protection, exception to the impossibility of repealing or canceling acts creating rights after 4 months
CE ass., October 21, 1966, Graciet Society: When the regulation had not received effective application, the regulatory act could be withdrawn at any time and for any reason
CE sect., November 14, 1958, Ponard + CE, April 15, 1988, Le Tahiti Civil Society: when the regulation had received effective application, it could only be withdrawn for illegality and within the time limit for contentious appeal
CE section, May 6, 1949, Bourgeois Society: Regulations are freely removable and, more broadly, modifiable
CE, sect., Despujol, January 10, 1930: New legal or factual circumstances allow for the request for repeal or amendment of a regulation against which the time limit for appeal has expired, and in case of refusal, to challenge it within the new time limit for appeal that it opens.
CE ass., January 10, 1964, National Union of Library Executives: The administration, seized of a request for repeal of an illegal regulation by an interested party, cannot reject it as this request is not subject to any time limit
CE sect., November 6, 1959, Coopérative laitière de Belfort: Refusal to establish an obligation to repeal regulations that are illegal from the outset in order to avoid establishing a procedure that would allow circumvention of the expiration of the contentious appeal period
CE ass., February 3, 1989, Alitalia: General obligation to repeal illegal regulations
CE, October 10, 2013, French Gymnastics Federation: The obligation to repeal ceases in the event that, due to a change in legal or factual circumstances, an illegal regulation becomes - or becomes again - legal
CE opinion, May 9, 2005, Marangio: While waiting for the repeal, the administration has an obligation not to apply the regulation tainted with illegality
CE sect., November 30, 1990: Association les Verts: The repeal of non-regulatory non-creative acts is mandatory, without any time limit, if they have become illegal due to a change in legal or factual circumstances, unless the act becomes legal again
CE, July 8, 1988, Prime Minister v/ SABDEC: the administration can without any time limit: Withdraw a decision granting a subsidy when the conditions for its granting have not been respected
CE Sec., October 12, 2009, Fontenille: the administration can without any time limit, repeal a decision creating rights whose maintenance is subject to a condition that is no longer satisfied
CE ass., October 26, 2001, Ternon: The administration can only repeal or withdraw a decision creating rights if it is illegal and if the repeal or withdrawal occurs within a period of 4 months following its enactment
CE sect., March 6, 2009, Coulibaly: The administration can only repeal or withdraw a decision creating rights if it is illegal and if the repeal or withdrawal occurs within a period of 4 months following its enactment
CE sect., November 6, 2002, Soulier: pecuniary advantage is a criterion for identifying a decision creating rights.
CE sect., November 29, 2002, Assistance publique Hôpitaux de Marseille: An advantage obtained by fraud is unworthy of protection, exception to the impossibility of repealing or canceling acts creating rights after 4 months
CE ass., October 21, 1966, Graciet Society: When the regulation had not received effective application, the regulatory act could be withdrawn at any time and for any reason
CE sect., November 14, 1958, Ponard + CE, April 15, 1988, Le Tahiti Civil Society: when the regulation had received effective application, it could only be withdrawn for illegality and within the time limit for contentious appeal
CE section, May 6, 1949, Bourgeois Society: Regulations are freely removable and, more broadly, modifiable
CE, sect., Despujol, January 10, 1930: New legal or factual circumstances allow for the request for repeal or amendment of a regulation against which the time limit for appeal has expired, and in case of refusal, to challenge it within the new time limit for appeal that it opens.
CE ass., January 10, 1964, National Union of Library Executives: The administration, seized of a request for repeal of an illegal regulation by an interested party, cannot reject it as this request is not subject to any time limit
CE sect., November 6, 1959, Coopérative laitière de Belfort: Refusal to establish an obligation to repeal regulations that are illegal from the outset in order to avoid establishing a procedure that would allow circumvention of the expiration of the contentious appeal period
CE ass., February 3, 1989, Alitalia: General obligation to repeal illegal regulations
CE, October 10, 2013, French Gymnastics Federation: The obligation to repeal ceases in the event that, due to a change in legal or factual circumstances, an illegal regulation becomes - or becomes again - legal
CE opinion, May 9, 2005, Marangio: While waiting for the repeal, the administration has an obligation not to apply the regulation tainted with illegality
CE sect., November 30, 1990: Association les Verts: The repeal of non-regulatory non-creative acts is mandatory, without any time limit, if they have become illegal due to a change in legal or factual circumstances, unless the act becomes legal again